Are you a pervert for seeing abstract and implied vaginas on book covers?
Sex sells. We know this. Implied sex also sells, and perhaps even more-so considering the audience for discreet sex is much wider (puritans can’t hate what they can’t define, right?).
But sometimes I’m not sure if I’m recognizing the marketing money-shot, or if I’m just perverted. Take a look at these possible vaginas and let me know in the comments.
Do Me: Tales of Sex & Love from Tin House
No need to question the intent with this one. Bibliophiliacs rejoice.
Before they Were Giants: First Works from Science Fiction Greats
It’s generally accepted that science fiction fans, at least traditionally, are sex-starved. If Dungeons & Dragons/Star Wars stereotypes have any root in truth, most sci-fi fans aren’t motivated by sex…unless that sex comes by way of a giant octopus vagina space monster.
Granta: The Magazine of New Writing. issue #110: Sex
Another obvious one (what is it with literary magazines and lack-of-subtlety?). At least this one apparently tries to imply a message by visual tension…a purse and a puss? I’d say there’s something about money being involved in sex, somewhere in this issue.
If you happen to own a mother’s purse candle (which can be purchased here), then I’m afraid your life just got a lot more Oedipal after reading this blog post. This candle store sits not far from where I live. The candle really does smell like a mother’s purse. Needless to say, I’m never reading this issue of Granta.
The Commoner: a novel by John Burnham Schwartz
Of all the covers, this one has the potential to be the most unintentional. The view from a womb perspective here probably doesn’t actually exist, the curtains are probably not of the beef variety. In fact, the bold section below (from the Amazon.com synopsis) is the only evidence that leads me to believe that not only womanhood, but the vagina itself, plays an important role in the novel, and therefore makes this cover vaginal.
It is 1959 when Haruko, a young woman of good family, marries the Crown Prince of Japan, the heir to the Chrysanthemum Throne. She is the first non-aristocratic woman to enter the longest-running, almost hermetically sealed, and mysterious monarchy in the world. Met with cruelty and suspicion by the Empress and her minions, Haruko is controlled at every turn. The only interest the court has in her is her ability to produce an heir.
Richard Yates by Tao Lin
Here’s how much of a nerd I am. Until very recently, I looked at this cover and thought only of Rene Magritte’s bowler hat series (see below). I’ve always known that my testosterone and sex drive were both low, so it makes sense that I would see the image of a 1960 Belgium surrealist painting rather than a vagina.
Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov
This cover was never actually released. Instead, the 50th anniversary edition was toned down, though quite simply so. In fact, a single 90-degree turn and a hue alteration changed this cover from offensive to universally tame.
So, what do you think? Am I a pervert? Are you a pervert?
I’m all aboard seeing more vaginas in the mainstream. I think they’re still a scandalous thing, despite the fact that you’ll see penis references everywhere. Is it perverted? Well, yes, but I think it’s in a positive way.
It’s a bit subversive, though, that you can show an open change purse in a sexual manner and it’s somehow more shocking than having a bikini-clad lady on there. Less skin, but it’s artistic in showing…more skin.
That’s selling sex the right way. As a female, I find it less discriminating.
Good call. I think when actual female parts are used in selling sex–the breasts, the vagina, the clad part of bikini clad–it prevents people from seeing beyond the organ. Whereas when the organ is used in the abstract, we are allowed to have a true conversation. It’s like the title of that Deftones album, “Around the Fur.” Though I don’t know that the band mean for the album to be taken the way I took it, that’s what I get from it: what’s around the fur (pubic hair)?