Author: Caleb J. Ross

  • The Velvet reads at the appropriately named The Velvet Lounge in Washington D.C

    The Velvet reads at the appropriately named The Velvet Lounge in Washington D.C

    Only one day back from Washington DC and already I miss it. The city was wonderful, of course, but what really impressed me was how nice the citizens were. Everyone from CVS counter workers to street repair people went out of their way to smile and offer a hello. And I definitely don’t project a aura of respectability, so these people couldn’t have feared I was in a position to fire them.

    One of the high points for me was definitely the Thursday night reading at The Velvet Lounge. So many friends, old and new, came out to read. The gathering and venue was small and intimate in the best way. Brandon Tietz, Nik Korpon, Michael Sonbert, Caleb J Ross (me), Jillian Weise, and Jesus Angel Garcia showed up, each with entourages and accumulated curiosities in tow, ready to make this event a memorable one. And that they did.

    Click here to go to The Velvet Podcast where each of the readings are available to download.

  • Blogging, Tweeting, and YouTubing from AWP all this week

    Blogging, Tweeting, and YouTubing from AWP all this week

    Between February 2nd and 5th I will be attending the AWP (Association of Writers and Writing Programs) Conference in Washington DC. During this time I’ll be temporarily relocated.

    Check often at the following places, where I (and a team of writers) will be reporting on the happenings at the conference all week. Be sure to subscribe to the blog, YouTube channel, and Podcast feed, and follow the Twitter stream.

    My AWP Blog (www.calebjross.com/awpblog)

    Expect summaries of panels and daily roundups of general goings-on

    AWPtweets (http://twitter.com/awptweets)

    As the majesty of Twitter has allowed and encouraged, expect disposable minutia here

    AWP Channel (www.youtube.com/awpchannel)

    While I would love to upload videos of every reading and panel discussion I attend, I assume AWP would have some copyright issues with that. So, expect instead videos of selected readings and perhaps a few quick interviews from the book fair floor. We’ll see.

    The Velvet Podcast (www.thevelvetpodcast.com)

    Because The Velvet Podcast isn’t something reserved specifically for AWP (as the above mediums are), expect interviews and discussions that cross from the academic focus of AWP to the noir-lit yet still intelligent focus of the Welcome to the Velvet forums. At least that is the plan. The Velvet Podcast tends to be pretty receptive of almost anything, so, I guess, expect almost anything.

  • Treat every book like The Bible

    Treat every book like The Bible

    Can you talk about a single book for one hour every week? Ministers/Priests/Pastors/Reverends/Etc. do. Why shouldn’t more books get the attention that religion texts do?

    Okay, most books don’t have a centuries-long history, a following (even a lukewarm one), or a cultivated lifestyle (excluding the Twilights and Harry Potters). What most books do have in common with religion texts is an industry infrastructure built to support their messages and the text itself; compelling narrative for the ultimate goal of better understand the human condition.

    But week after week after week…how? Religious clergy have the amazing ability to use a single book as a point of reflection for EVERYTHING, from  contemporary world events to domestic irritants. Natural disaster? War? Impoverished country? Acne? Grab a Bible, right? Why not grab The Confederacy of Dunces or House of Leaves? Each has interesting characters. Each depends on the reader’s own moral scope for impact. Each is a reflection of a life possibility, a Theory of Mind playground. Theory of Mind “…it is a term used by cognitive psychologists…to describe our ability to explain people’s behavior in terms of their thoughts, feelings, beliefs, and desires” (Lisa Zunshine, Why We Read Fiction, pg 15).

    Basically, Theory of Mind means that by reading about fictional characters in books, whether Johnny Truant, Ignatius J. Reilly, or Job, we implicate ourselves in their positions. This is the heart and magic of narrative. Sure, religion texts have the benefit of worldwide reach and passionate (sometimes vehemently so) devotees, but those aspects alone don’t reserve for the books a singular position as the only texts worth preaching.

    So claim a street corner and tell everyone why Ignatius J. Reilly is so repugnant yet simultaneously endearing.

  • David Mamet gets bleeped on The Simpsons, and maybe Chuck Palahniuk is there too

    David Mamet gets bleeped on The Simpsons, and maybe Chuck Palahniuk is there too

    (part of my ongoing Unexpected Literary References series)

    More Unexpected Literary references from The Simpsons. Surprised? You shouldn’t be.

    Okay, The Simpsons, time to step aside and let some other cartoon be the smarty-pants lit reference show. You’ve been the hipster long enough. Your gags are disproportionately literary-based, and for that The Simpsons, I would appreciate more fart jokes.

    By now you are probably thinking, “wait, I thought you loved lit references in cartoons.” Good call you.

    Playwright David Mamet makes an appearance as the dumped-on sitcom screenwriter for the fake 80s Growing Pains derivative Thicker Than Water. Mamet is perhaps most famous for his 1984 Pulitizer Prize winning play, Glengarry Glen Ross. What many might not know (but The Simpsons writers surely did) is that Mamet wrote a 1987 episode of the TV drama Hill Street Blues and is also an oft-writer of the television series The Unit. I hope his depiction as the shat-upon sitcom writer in The Simpsons didn’t bring up long buried painful memories.

    Earlier in the episode, another reference may have slipped by the casual viewer. While watching an episode of Thicker Than Water Homer quips after the television announcer states “filmed before a live studio audience” that “everyone in that studio audience is dead now.” Is this a reference taken from Chuck Palahniuk’s novel, Lullaby?:

    “Most of the laugh tracks on television were recorded in the early 1950s. These days, most of the people you hear laughing are dead” (pg 15).

    If it were any other show, I’d say this is a coincidence. But because The Simpsons bogarts everything literary, I’m thinking they’ve read some Palahniuk.

  • Validating the three publishing options: Traditional, Small/Independent, DIY

    Validating the three publishing options: Traditional, Small/Independent, DIY

    Honestly, when in the company of commercial press authors, defending my place as independent press author can be difficult. To those who have “made it” into the commercial presses, I would assume my defense comes across not nearly as articulately and convincingly as I would hope. Afterall, the examples of small press authors immigrating into the world of commercial presses far outweighs the number of commercial authors willing to emigrate to the small press world. The commercial press gatekeeper is much more discriminating than the indies; I understanding the disbelief. I too would go commercial if given the right opportunity.

    But things are getting easier. Not only are small press books showing face on historically commercial press-dominated shortlists (the recently announced 2010 National Book Critics Circle award finalists includes quite a few small press titles), but with the help of Jane Friedman the various publishing paths have been defined, and by extension, validated.

    In the summary of her Writers Digest Conference 2011 talk on publishing options Friedman very clearly explains what she sees as the basic three options for publishing:

    1. Tradition
    2. Independent or niche presses
    3. Self-publishing/DIY publisher

    But more, she outlines the viability of each path and goes even further to categorize according to which path that might suit them best. Her bullet-points follow:

    Pros, Cons, and Requirements:

    Traditional publishing:

    • It’s a commercially-driven business
    • Competitive – many people are trying to break in
    • National distribution – your work needs to merit that
    • Slower to market (usually)
    • Not the time to experiment
    • Persistence & patience
    • For non-fiction: you need a platform

    Small/independent press:

    • Weaker distribution, smaller print run
    • More personal attention, dedication
    • Usually less money
    • Niche marketing – smaller, specialized market; they’re experts in the field
    • More accepting of “art” (could be nonprofit), more service-minded

    DIY:

    • Entrepreneurial spirit
    • Direct connections with readership (for sales)
    • Must be comfortable with technology
    • Must enjoy connecting with people (online and off)
    • Requires energy to market and promote

    ALL of the options actually require energy to market and promote.

    It all boils down to you – your strengths, your work, your readers – to determine what’s best.

    Hell, just read the original post. (more…)

  • Social media is a natural fit for authors. Tip your readers!

    Social media is a natural fit for authors. Tip your readers!


    When I’m not authoring mind explosions, I spend part of my time professionally involved with social media. One of the items my company stresses with our clients is that social media is not about pushing a message of product, product, product. It’s about engaging with customers and potential customers on a personal level. This means breaking the traditional advertising bullhorn approach of “BUY THIS NOW” with quips about the weather or TV shows, for example (though perhaps still tangentially related to the company’s product line). For most companies, dialog sans advertising is a foreign concept. For authors, this should be easy.

    Authors are their books

    Authors are inextricably linked to their products in a way that traditional companies are not. Denis Dutton in The Art Instinct: Beauty, Pleasure, & Human Evolution explores the idea that fiction always concerns and navigates three persons, one of whom is the author.

    “There is also the transaction between reader and author—the latter understood by the reader as an actual person, the creator of the story, who negotiates between the various points of view of fictional persons (the characters), the author’s own point of view, and the point of view of the reader. These three elements are present in every experience of fiction; in fact, they exhaust the list of operative elements” (pg 124).

    Authors control the show by “persuading, manipulating, wheedling, planting hints, adopting a tone, and so forth: whatever will appeal to the reader and create a convincing interpretation, including interpretations of ambiguous events. This makes the experience of a story inescapably social” (pg 125).

    The author is always present. This is not the case when, for example, going to a pizza shop; you don’t normally consider the pizza chef when eating pizza, whether consciously or unconsciously. When reading, you do consider the author.

    Authors vs. books: one is not more important than the other

    The author’s aversion to social media is understood. Most of us like to think of our work not as a product to be sold but as an artifact worth cherishing and that the book should be thought of independently from the author. It’s a simple personal life vs. profession life argument. However, this is a romantic ideal, not a reality.

    The truth is our DVD-behind-the-scenes-extras culture has trained us to expect glimpses of the minds behind the art. This expectation should be embraced, not avoided. Would Dostoyevsky fall from his pedestal if he tweeted that he had a particularly terrible sandwich from the corner bistro? Maybe, for some. But I think the number of current readers that would be alienated by this humanization would be offset by a crowd of new potential readers who would be endeared by the man’s personal revelations.

    Take Ray Garton (@RayGarton) for example. Here’s a writer I would never have known had it not been for his phenomenal presence on Twitter. He’s personable, rarely salesy, and funnier than most tweeting comedians. I didn’t learn about the author after learning of his books. Instead I got interested in the books after learning about the author, which is a transposition that seems to be more and more common.

    How to engage using social media

    An article at the London Book Fair site offers this advice for authors looking to engage in social media:

    “It’s probably a mistake for authors to be part of more than one network – it’s simply too time-consuming to keep up with several accounts, so choose Facebook or MySpace, but not both. They should also be aware of posting in haste the sort of personal detail that may be repented at leisure, and they should certainly resist the urge to respond to every criticism and to promote their own work at the expense of others. More than one exposé has demonstrated the dangers of that.”

    I would agree with all but the first point. There are many tools available to make simultaneously posting to multiple platforms easy (Tweetdeck, Twitterfeed, and RSS Graffiti together will take care of 99% of your cross-posting needs). Besides, not all of your potential readers are on a single network; you should be where your readers are (NOTE: as of this posting, I have actually deleted my MySpace account. Shame on me, I suppose. MySpace caters to MTV watchers, and I don’t think my readers fit that demographic. Now, if The Discovery Channel or the Film Noir Foundation buy MySpace, then I’ll probably be back).

    A few more tips:

    • Work humor into your messages. Nothing breaks down defenses quite like humor.
    • Post messages a few times/day if possible. Publish blog posts a few times/week.
    • Leave comments on reader blogs (like this one) and Facebook messages. Re-tweet reader tweets.
    • Your first priority should be engaging with readers. Selling books should be a second or third tier goal.
    • The Simon & Schuster.biz site has many more tips. Go there.

    Consider yourself a member of the literary community, not just a content producer

    Honestly, when perceived as a gesture of inclusion, the author who doesn’t participate in social media could be seen as a kind of a dick. I don’t want to generalize—there are valid reasons for not participating, of course—but for those authors without a good reason, refusing to interact with readers is like not tipping your bartender.

    Photo credit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/jcroft/

  • American Dad fandangles Dr. Seuss’ red fish typewriter blue fish

    American Dad fandangles Dr. Seuss’ red fish typewriter blue fish

    (part of my ongoing Unexpected Literary References series)

    Season 1, episode 15 (“Star Trek”), of the always entertaining “American Dad” plots the sudden rise of Steve Smith as a children’s book author. This premise, of course, is perfect for literary nods. Strange, though, that I only caught two.

    Dr. Seuss' First Typewriter
    Nod to Stephen King in the opening gag

    See the entire episode here:

    Additional hilarious photo (I paused the embedded video at just the right/wrong time):